-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/reintroduce flux limiter #772
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…ofile columns flux_limit_lambda and flux_limit_R (ported from r9793)
Porting the flux-limiter prescription from r9793 to the latest MESA version
Let's make sure there are no floating point errors associated with this. I don't know if we need to save any star information in the photos, but let's see what happens to : all use dPrad_dm form of the T-gradient eqn. https://testhub.mesastar.org/feature%2Freintroduce_flux_limiter/commits/9f8a91c. I'll add a fpe check as well. |
@@ -8226,6 +8234,7 @@ | |||
! :: | |||
|
|||
use_dPrad_dm_form_of_T_gradient_eqn = .false. | |||
use_flux_limiting_with_dPrad_dm_form = .true. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
reminder: switch back to false before merge
see #771. where @JRGarza has reimplemented a flux limiter for use with the dPrad_dm form of the T-gradient equation.
Resolves #769
Related to #625